Academic Research Project Finder

لسلام عليكم،

أرغب في تنفيذ تحليل أو دعم لمراجعة منهجية (Systematic Review) باستخدام Jamovi، وأود معرفة التالي:

ما البيانات أو الملفات التي تحتاجها مني؟
هل تحتاج بروتوكول الدراسة أو سؤال البحث، ومعايير الاشتمال والاستبعاد، وملفات الدراسات أو قاعدة البيانات؟
ما نوع التحليلات التي يمكنك تنفيذها باستخدام Jamovi؟
كم تستغرق مدة التنفيذ؟
وكم التكلفة الإجمالية للخدمة؟

بانتظار ردك، وشكرًا.

Environmental Engineering Research Mentor (High School Research Internship)

About the Project

YouthBridge Global Education is seeking an experienced researcher, academic, PhD candidate, or postgraduate student in Environmental Engineering to mentor a high school student through a one-month research internship.

The objective of the internship is to guide the student in producing a 4,000 - 8,000 word literature review on a selected Environmental Engineering topic. This is a secondary research project only - no laboratory work, experiments, or primary data collection are required.

The mentor's role is to teach the student how to think and write like a researcher, rather than writing the paper for them.

Potential Research Topics

The student will choose one of the following topics:

- Plastic pollution and its impact on marine ecosystems
- Microplastics in drinking water and human health
- Sustainable solid waste management and recycling practices
- Rainwater harvesting as a solution to water scarcity
- Air pollution in urban areas and mitigation strategies
- Renewable energy technologies for sustainable development

If you have expertise in a closely related area, we are open to discussing alternative research topics.

Scope of Work

The selected mentor will:

Guide the student in selecting and refining a research topic
Teach the fundamentals of academic research and literature reviews
Recommend relevant academic journals, books, and research papers
Help the student identify credible academic sources
Explain how to critically analyse and synthesise literature
Provide feedback on research structure, academic writing, and clarity
Guide the student on referencing and bibliography (APA, Harvard, IEEE, etc.)
Review draft submissions and provide constructive feedback
Ensure the student completes a well-structured literature review independently

This is a mentorship role. The student is expected to complete all writing themselves.

Meeting Schedule

The mentor will meet the student:

Monday
Wednesday
Friday

Approximately 45 - 60 minutes per session over 4 weeks (12 scheduled meetings).

Additional meetings may be arranged if required.

Meetings will be conducted virtually via Google Meet.

A representative from YouthBridge Global Education shall attend meetings for quality assurance and student support.

Final Student Deliverables

By the end of the internship, the student should produce:

Research Proposal
Annotated Bibliography
4,000 - 8,000 word Literature Review
Complete references and bibliography
Final reflection on the research process

Ideal Candidate

We are looking for someone who has:
A Master's degree, PhD, or is currently pursuing a PhD in Environmental Engineering or a closely related discipline
Experience conducting academic research and publishing scholarly work
Strong academic writing and literature review skills
Excellent spoken and written English
Previous teaching, tutoring, or mentoring experience (preferred)
The ability to explain complex concepts to motivated high school students

About YouthBridge Global Education

YouthBridge Global Education provides personalised research internships for high school students aspiring to study at leading universities worldwide. Our programmes pair students with academics and researchers to explore university-level subjects while developing research, analytical, and academic writing skills through structured mentorship.

This project will also lead to additional mentorship opportunities as we are building a panel of academic mentors to assist students in doing research across various fields.

I am looking for an experienced academic outreach or scholarly communications specialist to help improve the visibility and organic Google Scholar citations of several peer-reviewed research papers.

The work should focus only on legitimate, field-relevant methods, such as identifying suitable academic communities, researchers, conferences, repositories, and reputable journals or platforms where the research can be appropriately shared and discovered.

Key responsibilities:

Review my research papers, topics, and target academic fields
Develop a strategy to improve research visibility and discoverability
Identify relevant researchers, journals, conferences, repositories, and academic networks
Support ethical outreach and dissemination activities
Recommend improvements to author profiles such as Google Scholar, ORCID, ResearchGate, and institutional repositories
Provide a clear activity tracker and progress report

We're looking for an exceptionally detail-oriented researcher to help organize and verify a large documentary archive.

The project includes recorded conversations (already transcribed), thousands of emails, and related documents.

Using modern AI tools, you'll help:
* Verify transcripts against audio recordings
* Review summaries for accuracy
* Search and organize large collections of emails
* Identify documents relevant to recurring themes
* Cross-reference recordings, transcripts, and emails

We're looking for someone who:

* Has excellent written English
* Is highly organized and detail-oriented
* Enjoys careful research and solving complex documentary puzzles
* Has extensive experience AI tools such as ChatGPT and Claude to organize, search, and analyze large collections of documents

Experience in editing, legal document review, research, archival work, or similar fields is a plus.

This is an hourly contract position with the potential for substantial ongoing work.

To apply, please briefly tell us why this project interests you and describe any relevant experience.

I need an academic research paper focused on evidence-based practice in the healthcare sector.

Requirements:
- In-depth research and analysis on a specific evidence-based practice topic within healthcare
- Comprehensive review of current literature
- Clear, structured, and academic writing style
- Proper citation and referencing according to academic standards

Ideal Skills and Experience:
- Advanced degree in healthcare or related field
- Strong research and analytical skills
- Experience writing academic papers
- Familiarity with evidence-based practice in healthcare

Looking for a detailed and well-articulated paper based on the question
In pregnant women diagnosed with gestational hypertension, does a technology-supported, nurse-led education and lifestyle-management program, compared with routine antenatal care, reduce blood pressure and progression to preeclampsia during pregnancy?



NR449 RUA: Topic Search Strategy (Sept23)
NR449 RUA: Topic Search Strategy (Sept23)
Criteria Ratings Pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeClinical Question (30 points/25%)
1. Describe the problem. What is the focus of your group’s work?

2. Explain the significance of the problem in terms of patient outcomes. What health outcomes result from your problem? Or what statistics document this is a problem? You may find support on websites for government or professional organizations.

3. PICOT question in support of the group topic.

4. State the purpose of your paper. What will your paper do or describe? This is similar
to a problem statement. “The purpose of this paper is to . . .”
30 pts
Highest Level of Performance
Includes 4 requirements.
26 pts
High Level of Performance
Includes 3 requirements.
23 pts
Satisfactory Level of Performance
Includes 2 requirements.
12 pts
Unsatisfactory Level of Performance
Includes 1 requirement.
0 pts
Section not Present
No requirements for this section presented.
30 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeLevels of Evidence (20 points/16%)
1. Identify the type of question being asked (therapy, prognosis, meaning, etc.).

2. What is the best type of evidence to answer that question (e.g., RCT, cohort study, qualitative study, etc.)?
20 pts
Highest Level of Performance/High Level of Performance
Includes 2 requirements.
10 pts
Satisfactory Level of Performance
Includes 1 requirement.
0 pts
Unsatisfactory Level of Performance/Section Not Present
No requirements for this section presented.
20 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeSearch Strategy (50 points/43%)
1. List search terms and results.

2. Databases used (start with the CU library). Link your search with the PICOT question described above.

3. Refinement decisions. As you did your search, what decisions did you make in refinement to get your required articles down to a reasonable number for review? Were any limits used? If so, what?

4. Identification of two (2) most relevant articles (primary sources published within the last 5 years).
50 pts
Highest Level of Performance
Includes 4 requirements.
43 pts
High Level of Performance
Includes 3 requirements.
38 pts
Satisfactory Level of Performance
Includes 2 requirements.
19 pts
Unsatisfactory Level of Performance
Includes 1 requirement.
0 pts
Section Not Present
No requirements for this section presented.
50 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeOrganization and APA Style (20 points/16%)
1. Correct grammar and spelling.

2. Include a title page.

3. Use of headings for each section.

4. Clinical Question, Levels of Evidence, Search Strategy, and Conclusion

5. Adheres to current APA formatting and guidelines.

6. 3-4 pages in length, excluding title and reference pages.
20 pts
Highest Level of Performance
Includes 6 requirements.
17 pts
High Level of Performance
Includes 5 requirements.
15 pts
Satisfactory Level of Performance
Includes 3-4 requirements.
8 pts
Unsatisfactory Level of Performance
Includes 1-2 requirements.
0 pts
Section Not Present
No requirements for this section presented.
20 pts
Total Points: 120

Skills: Research, Technical Writing, Report Writing, Research Writing, Medical Writing, Statistical Analysis, Qualitative Research, Academic Writing, Academic Research, Public Health

I am looking for one careful independent qualitative coder for an academic research study concerning designers’ experiences while refining garment images with an AI-supported design tool.

You will receive a fillable PDF containing:

-A fixed codebook
-81 short interview or think-aloud extracts
-One coding decision required for each extract

Your task is to read each extract and select the one code that best represents its main meaning. This is structured qualitative content coding. It is not transcription, open-ended thematic analysis, proofreading, or image evaluation.

The form includes an Unsure option and an optional note field for extracts that are genuinely difficult to classify.

The task should take approximately 45–60 minutes, depending on reading speed and care.

Requirements
===========
-Experience with qualitative coding, content analysis, academic research, or text annotation
-Strong written English comprehension
-Ability to follow a fixed codebook carefully
-Excellent attention to detail
-Ability to complete and save a fillable PDF
-Available to complete the task today
Important conditions
-Work independently
-Do not use ChatGPT or any other AI tool
-Do not consult another person
-Do not search for information outside the supplied PDF
-Do not discuss the extracts or coding decisions with anyone
-Deliverable

Return the completed PDF with:

-Exactly one code selected for every extract
-Any genuine uncertainty marked using the Unsure box
-Optional short notes where clarification may be needed
-All responses saved and visible after reopening the PDF

Please describe your previous experience with qualitative coding or content analysis in your proposal.

Hello, you are being requested to take part in a survey of 25 - 30 minutes for academic research purposes.

Since many established resources for employees, such as organizational support or supervisors, do not apply to freelancers, this study intends to help freelancers with strategies to have a better freelancing experience on Upwork or other comparable platforms. We will use your answers to guide new and experienced freelancers on building their profiles on labor platforms and managing their freelancing career, as well as suggest improvements to the platforms and to policymakers. If you are interested, we can provide you with a summary of our major findings from our completed research study once our research is complete (tentatively around December 2029 or so), after contacting you via Upwork.

In this study, you will not have any more risks than you have in normal life. This study has been approved by the researchers' institutional research ethics board.

We welcome freelancers across experience levels, earnings, and ratings who:
(i) provide freelancing services on their own (not as part of an agency or company),
(ii) are over 18 years of age,
(iii) have provided freelancing services for more than 1 year on Upwork,
(iv) have worked on freelancing projects in the past 1 year on Upwork, and
(v) have a Job Success Score on their profile.

If you meet all the criteria listed above, please respond to this online survey job posting only if you consent to participating in this survey and allowing us to use certain details from your public Upwork profile for statistical purposes. Once you begin the survey, you have up to 72 hours to complete it, beyond which time the survey platform will mark your responses as incomplete. Please pay attention to all the questions.

Your responses and information will be kept confidential and used for academic purposes only. Your information will be stored in a secure academic database on a university-licensed secure platform to ensure confidentiality. The research team will have access to your survey responses and details captured from your public profile on Upwork, for the purpose of analysis. You will not be personally identified in our analysis or reporting. While storing the data from the survey, a participant ID number will be used instead of your name. We will collect some information from your public Upwork profile with your consent (e.g., ratings, job category, total earnings, etc.) to understand the difference in freelance experience. Profile information that is captured from your public profile on Upwork with your consent will be anonymized for data analysis and reporting so that it is not identifiable with your details and will only be recorded against your participant ID number.

Please use a laptop or tablet to complete the survey. We recommend not using a mobile.

Compensation: You will receive $8 for your participation. Kindly note, you will be compensated upon completion of the survey as per standard Upwork processes. At the end of the survey, you will be provided with a random ID number that will need to be shared with us on Upwork Message. This will enable us to process your compensation via the Upwork platform, as per standard Upwork processes.

Your participation in this survey is voluntary. You can choose to respond to only the questions that you are comfortable with. You may withdraw from the study for any reason. You do not have to explain why. You will not be penalized in any way. You can stop participating in the survey at any time. You may skip the questions, where applicable, or use the ‘Not applicable or NA’/‘Not sure’/‘Prefer not to disclose’ options, or even close the browser to end the survey. While we hope that you will complete the survey, we will compensate you for the first milestone for partial completion of the survey. Your Upwork profile will not be adversely impacted in any way by your participation in the survey, even if you choose to terminate the survey midway, as we will provide a 5-star rating without feedback upon completion to preserve the research integrity.

Survey time: Approximately 25-30 minutes. The actual time may vary.

The survey will be conducted via an online survey platform. The survey will begin only after you provide your consent. We will seek your consent electronically at the start of the online survey regarding:
• Consent to participate
• Consent to record non-personal information from your public profile without personally identifying you in the data.

This is a one-time survey with an option to be contacted about any future phases of this multi-phase study. By agreeing to be contacted, you are not required to participate in any future phases. Participation in any of the follow-up surveys is voluntary and will be compensated separately for each follow-up survey, similar to the compensation process followed for the initial survey.

Please respond to this online survey job posting once you agree to the above requirements. If you have any more questions, you can contact us through Upwork Message.

Hello, you are being requested to take part in a survey of 25 - 30 minutes for academic research purposes.

Since many established resources for employees, such as organizational support or supervisors, do not apply to freelancers, this study intends to help freelancers with strategies to have a better freelancing experience on Upwork or other comparable platforms. We will use your answers to guide new and experienced freelancers on building their profiles on labor platforms like Upwork and managing their freelancing career, as well as suggest improvements to the platforms and to policymakers. If you are interested, we can provide you with a summary of our major findings from our completed research study once our research is complete (tentatively around December 2029 or so), after contacting you via Upwork.

In this study, you will not have any more risks than you have in normal life. This study has been approved by the researchers' institutional research ethics board.

We welcome freelancers across experience levels, earnings, and ratings who:
(i) provide freelancing services on their own (not as part of an agency or company),
(ii) are over 18 years of age,
(iii) have participated in the previous survey conducted by us.

If you meet all the criteria listed above, please respond to this online survey job posting only if you consent to participating in this survey and allowing us to use certain details from your public Upwork profile for statistical purposes. Once you begin the survey, you have up to 72 hours to complete it, beyond which time the survey platform will mark your responses as incomplete. Please pay attention to all the questions.

Your responses and information will be kept confidential and used for academic purposes only. Your information will be stored in a secure academic database on a university-licensed secure platform to ensure confidentiality. The research team will have access to your survey responses and details captured from your public profile on Upwork, for the purpose of analysis. You will not be personally identified in our analysis or reporting. While storing the data from the survey, a participant ID number will be used instead of your name. We will collect some information from your public Upwork profile with your consent (e.g., ratings, job category, total earnings, etc.) to understand the difference in freelance experience. Profile information that is captured from your public profile on Upwork with your consent will be anonymized for data analysis and reporting so that it is not identifiable with your details and will only be recorded against your participant ID number.

Please use a laptop or tablet to complete the survey. We recommend not using a mobile.

Compensation: You will receive $8 for your participation. Kindly note, you will be compensated upon completion of the survey as per standard Upwork processes. At the end of the survey, you will be provided with a random ID number that will need to be shared with us on Upwork Message. This will enable us to process your compensation via the Upwork platform, as per standard Upwork processes.

Your participation in this survey is voluntary. You can choose to respond to only the questions that you are comfortable with. You may withdraw from the study for any reason. You do not have to explain why. You will not be penalized in any way. You can stop participating in the survey at any time. You may skip the questions, where applicable, or use the ‘Not applicable or NA’/‘Not sure’/‘Prefer not to disclose’ options, or even close the browser to end the survey. While we hope that you will complete the survey, we will compensate you for the first milestone for partial completion of the survey. Your Upwork profile will not be adversely impacted in any way by your participation in the
survey, even if you choose to terminate the survey midway, as we will provide a 5-star rating without feedback upon completion to preserve the research integrity.

Survey time: Approximately 25-30 minutes. The actual time may vary.

The survey will be conducted via an online survey platform. The survey will begin only after you provide your consent. We will seek your consent electronically at the start of the online survey regarding:
• Consent to participate
• Consent to record non-personal information from your public profile without personally identifying you in the data.

This is a one-time survey with an option to be contacted about any future phases of this multi-phase study. By agreeing to be contacted, you are not required to participate in any future phases. Participation in any of the follow-up surveys is voluntary and will be compensated separately for each follow-up survey, similar to the compensation process followed for the initial survey.

Please respond to this online survey job posting once you agree to the above requirements. If you have any more questions, you can contact us through Upwork Message.

Hello! This is a fixed-price, one-time project (~8-10 hours) and I’m looking for a careful second pair of eyes.

Scope: the packet has four modules -
1. Short passages from political-science, sociology, economics, public-administration, and public-policy texts. You assign one letter (A–H, or X) for where the passage's governing consequence lands and one number (1 or 2) for whether the author teaches that move or describes/criticizes it.
2. A complete set of value-invocations from four fixed founding-text chapters, including both direct and displaced cases. These use the same letter/number rules and test the initial direct-versus-displaced judgment.
3. Predefined operative units from twelve federal statutes. For each unit, you decide only whether it attaches directly to the statute's named objective or instead operates through a proxy, threshold, formula, report, procedure, administrator, or intermediate program.
4. A 57-passage direction check. You classify the named value and governing destination on a coarse `check / concentrate / unclear` dimension; the spreadsheet then records whether the relation follows the expected direction, reverses it, stays on the same side, or is unclear.

What I’ll send you: - The materials are laid out in spreadsheets with source, year, locator, excerpt, answer columns, and an optional notes column. A short codebook and examples define every answer.

What I am looking for: some experience with content analysis, qualitative coding, or systematic review is a plus, but it’s not required. Mostly I’m looking for someone who reads closely and codes consistently/is comfortable applying a written decision tree across many items.

How it’ll go: we’ll start with a quick calibration on the first handful of rows so you feel settled with the guide ($50), then you take it from there. If anything’s unclear as you go, just ask — happy to help. If a row feels genuinely ambiguous, jot a note in the coder_notes column and keep moving.

To apply:
1. Tell me about a task where you applied a fixed set of rules consistently across many records or passages.
2. What would you do when an individual item is ambiguous but the general rule is clear?

We are looking for a careful and reliable visual image-quality rater for an academic research study involving AI-generated garment edits.

You will receive 120 rating items. Each item includes:

- A written editing request
- A BEFORE garment image
- An AFTER garment image

You will evaluate the AFTER image using a provided rating form. The questions assess:

-Visible structural damage or distorted garment parts
-Overall rendering quality
-Whether the requested change was completed
-Whether unrelated parts of the garment were preserved
-Whether the edited area fits naturally with the rest of the garment

The task is expected to take approximately 90–120 minutes. Ratings will be entered directly into an interactive PDF form.

This task does not involve drawing bounding boxes, segmentation, programming, machine-learning model development or creating images.

The ideal candidate has previous experience in image annotation, visual quality assurance, image evaluation or reviewing AI-generated images. Experience reviewing clothing, fashion, textile or e-commerce images is helpful, but formal fashion-design training is not required.

The selected candidate will first complete a short paid calibration task to confirm that the rating instructions are understood. The full task must be completed independently and without using AI tools.

Please apply only if you can carefully follow a detailed rating guide and apply the same standards consistently across all 120 items.

Hello! This is a fixed-price, one-time project (~2-4 hours).

I have a small content-coding project and I’m looking for a careful second pair of eyes.
You’ll work from a one-page guide and two spreadsheets. Each row is a short passage that’s already been pulled out for you — you read the passage and pick codes from dropdown menus, three codes per row.

Scope: 136 rows total, across two sheets (83 and 53).

What I’ll send you: - The two spreadsheets (dropdowns already built in) - The one-page guide, with definitions and a few worked examples

What I am looking for: some experience with content analysis, qualitative coding, or systematic review is a plus, but it’s not required. Mostly I’m looking for someone who reads closely and codes consistently.

How it’ll go: we’ll start with a quick calibration on the first handful of rows so you feel settled with the guide ($50), then you take it from there. If anything’s unclear as you go, just ask — happy to help. If a row feels genuinely ambiguous, jot a note in the coder_notes column and keep moving.

I have a complete academic manuscript that now needs a sharp editorial eye before submission. The content is solid, but I want every sentence to read smoothly, all terminology to be precise, and the overall tone to stay strictly scholarly. I’m looking for you to:

• Correct grammar, punctuation, and spelling without altering meaning.
• Refine flow, remove repetition, and flag any ambiguous phrasing.
• Ensure headings, tables, figures, and in-text references are consistently formatted.
• Leave detailed comments where a rewrite is advisable and track all changes so I can review them easily in Word.

A clean, publication-ready version and the tracked-changes file will serve as the final deliverables. If you have expertise with common style guides (APA, MLA, or Chicago) let me know, and we can apply the one most suited to my target journal.

Skills: Proofreading, Editing, Research Writing, Article Rewriting, Academic Writing, Copy Editing, Academic Publishing, Academic Research

We are looking for a careful and reliable visual image-quality rater for an academic research study involving AI-generated garment edits.

You will receive 120 rating items. Each item includes:

A written editing request
A BEFORE garment image
An AFTER garment image

You will evaluate the AFTER image using a provided rating form. The questions assess:

Visible structural damage or distorted garment parts
Overall rendering quality
Whether the requested change was completed
Whether unrelated parts of the garment were preserved
Whether the edited area fits naturally with the rest of the garment

The task is expected to take approximately 90–120 minutes. Ratings will be entered directly into an interactive PDF form.

This task does not involve drawing bounding boxes, segmentation, programming, machine-learning model development or creating images.

The ideal candidate has previous experience in image annotation, visual quality assurance, image evaluation or reviewing AI-generated images. Experience reviewing clothing, fashion, textile or e-commerce images is helpful, but formal fashion-design training is not required.

The selected candidate will first complete a short paid calibration task to confirm that the rating instructions are understood. The full task must be completed independently and without using AI tools.

Please apply only if you can carefully follow a detailed rating guide and apply the same standards consistently across all 120 items.

I'm seeking an expert to craft a high-impact resume/CV for an academic researcher with a strong medical background.

Essential Requirements:
- Emphasis on research experience is crucial.
- Highlight published papers, conference presentations, and published books.
- Prior experiences and a strong academic background are necessary.
- Harvard alumni status should be prominently featured.

Ideal Skills and Experience:
- Proven experience in writing academic and research-focused CVs/resumes.
- Strong understanding of the academic research landscape.
- Ability to articulate complex research experiences clearly and effectively.
- Excellent writing skills with attention to detail.

Please provide samples of previous work and a brief outline of your approach.

Skills: Research, Proofreading, Research Writing, Grant Writing, Proposal Writing, Academic Writing, Academic Publishing, Academic Research, Scientific Writing, Writing Tutoring

We run an animated history YouTube channel (deadpan humor, OverSimplified style) and we're looking for a history researcher to work with us on an ongoing basis, roughly two episodes a month.


What the role is:

You research a historical topic and deliver a clear, well-organized document of accurate, verified facts that our scriptwriter then turns into an episode. You are the foundation of each video: the history has to be right, and it has to be interesting.

Our format covers entire periods, wars, or events from start to finish, "The Entire History of..." style. So your research needs to tell the complete story end to end: the causes, the key events in order, the turning points, and the outcome. Not isolated facts, but the full arc a writer can build a 20-minute narrative from.

Example topics we'll cover: Ancient Egypt, Medieval Europe, the history of the USA, WW1, WW2, the British Empire, the Vietnam War, major battles and wars, and so on. Broad periods synthesized clearly from beginning to end.



What we need from you:

- Solid, accurate research from reliable sources (not just a Wikipedia summary)

- Full coverage of the topic start to finish, structured as a clear narrative arc

- Sources cited, so we can verify and stand behind our facts

- Good judgment for what's actually interesting: the surprising details, the turning points, the moments that make a story worth telling. We don't just want a dry list of dates, we want the good stuff flagged.

- Clear organization (chronological) so a writer can build the episode straight from your document



What the role is NOT:

You are not writing the script or the jokes. That's a separate role. You provide the raw historical material, someone else makes it funny.

You don't need to be an academic, but you do need to genuinely care about history and getting it right.


Details:

- Fixed price per research document, ongoing collaboration for the right person

- We'll start with one paid test topic so we can both see if it's a fit

- Budget: around $100 per document, depending on depth and scope


To apply: tell us briefly why history is your thing, and if you have any past research or writing samples (history-related ideally), send them over.

BodyPower is recruiting a team of approximately 15–20 freelance online researchers and social-media content scouts to support the BodyPower Metabolic Health Conference 2026.

Your role will be to search the internet every day and identify fresh, relevant and credible developments relating to metabolic health, obesity treatment, GLP-1 medications, fitness coaching, peptides, hormones, longevity and the changing health and fitness industry.

This is not a content-writing or social-media management role.

We are looking for people who are excellent at finding useful information, original sources, breaking news, videos, interviews, studies, public statements and social-media discussions.

Daily Deadline

Researchers must submit their findings every day by 10:00 AM IST.

You may work from any location, but reliability and punctual daily delivery are essential.

Topics to Research

You will search for developments relating to:

GLP-1 medications, including Mounjaro, Wegovy, Ozempic, Zepbound and emerging treatments
New obesity and weight-management drugs
GLP-1, GIP, glucagon and triple-agonist treatments
Muscle loss during weight loss
Protein intake and resistance training
Personal trainers and coaches working with GLP-1 users
Obesity, diabetes and metabolic-health statistics
Testosterone replacement therapy and hormone health
Peptides, peptide regulation, safety and scientific evidence
Longevity and preventive health
Nutrition, appetite and changes in food consumption
Metabolic-health coaching
New opportunities for personal trainers, coaches, gyms and clinics
Changes affecting the fitness, pharmaceutical, food, healthcare and wellness industries
What You Should Search For

Do not limit your research to ordinary news websites.

We want researchers who can find:

New surveys and public-opinion polls
Newly released datasets and statistics
Academic studies and research papers
Clinical-trial results
Government announcements and policy changes
NHS announcements and guidance
MHRA, NICE, FDA, EMA and WHO announcements
New drug approvals, safety warnings or investigations
Pharmaceutical and healthcare company announcements
Statements from doctors, researchers, politicians and industry leaders
Podcast clips and interviews
YouTube videos
Public X/Twitter posts and threads
Public Instagram posts, Reels and interviews
Publicly accessible TikTok videos
Conference talks and panel discussions
Newspaper and magazine investigations
Trending myths and misinformation
Positive patient outcomes and transformation stories
Controversial or surprising opinions
Topics currently being discussed by fitness professionals
New services launched by gyms, clinics, coaches or healthcare companies
Competitor conferences, courses and educational programmes
Viral content connected to metabolic health
Submission Format

Every item submitted must include:

Headline or short description
Direct link to the original source
Date published or posted
Name of the source, organisation or person
Two or three sentences explaining what the content is about
Why it is relevant to the BodyPower Metabolic Health Conference
Suggested category, such as GLP-1, obesity, peptides, TRT, longevity, coaching, nutrition or industry news

Where possible, submit the original source rather than a website that has copied or summarised it.

Payment Structure

This is a pay-per-approved-item project.

You will be paid only for content that:

Is relevant to the BodyPower Metabolic Health Conference 2026
Is current, useful and credible
Has not already been submitted by another researcher
Includes a working direct link
Meets the required submission format
Has genuine potential to support our marketing, education, research or social-media content

Submitting a large number of weak, unrelated, duplicated or outdated links will not result in payment.

The final payment rate per approved item will be agreed with selected freelancers before work begins.

Consistently strong researchers may receive:

Regular daily work
Higher payment rates
Priority access to additional research projects
Longer-term opportunities with BodyPower
Important Quality Rules

Do not submit:

Old stories presented as new
Duplicate links
AI-generated summaries without checking the original source
General health articles with no clear relevance
Unverified medical claims
Private or restricted social-media content
Broken links
Promotional spam
Content copied from another researcher
Full social-media captions unless specifically requested

All medical, scientific and regulatory information must be represented accurately. Researchers should never exaggerate a finding or present an early study as established medical fact.

Who We Are Looking For

This project may suit:

Online researchers
Journalism or media students
Medical, pharmaceutical or life-science students
Fitness and nutrition professionals
Social-media researchers
Healthcare researchers
People experienced in finding trends, viral content or breaking news
People familiar with Google Scholar, PubMed, government websites, YouTube, X, Instagram, podcasts and news databases

Previous experience in metabolic health is helpful but not essential. Training and examples will be provided.

Required Skills
Strong online research skills
Good written English
Ability to recognise credible sources
Ability to summarise information clearly
Understanding of social-media platforms
Attention to detail
Reliability and punctuality
Ability to work independently
Basic understanding of health, fitness or medical topics
Trial Process

Shortlisted applicants may be asked to complete a small trial by finding a limited number of recent items that match the project requirements.

The trial will be used to assess:

Relevance
Originality
Source quality
Accuracy
Speed
Ability to follow the required format
How to Apply

Please include the following in your proposal:

Your location and timezone
Your research experience
Any experience in health, fitness, pharmaceuticals, journalism or social media
The websites and platforms you would use for this research
Confirmation that you can submit daily findings by 10:00 AM IST
Two examples of recent metabolic-health stories, studies, videos or social-media posts you believe would be relevant to this project
Your proposed payment per approved item

Please begin your proposal with the words:

“BODYPOWER RESEARCH TEAM”

Applications that do not include these words may not be reviewed.

This is an opportunity to join a large research team supporting an international metabolic-health conference and helping identify the information that will shape the future of fitness, coaching and preventive health.

Skills: Research, Health, Nutrition, Data Analysis, Academic Research, Fitness, Medical Research, English Translation, Public Health

I am seeking an experienced academic copy editor to polish a manuscript being submitted to a top-tier hospitality management journal. The paper reports a two-phase mixed-methods study: a customer survey with mediation analysis (PROCESS macro), and a choice-based conjoint analysis with industry managers.

1. Line-level copy editing only: grammar, sentence flow, tense consistency, article usage, punctuation, and idiomatic academic register.
2. Do NOT restructure sections, alter the argument, or change the meaning of any empirical results, statistics, or findings.
3. Preserve all numerical results, citations, and technical terminology exactly as written; flag (don't silently change) anything that seems inconsistent or unclear.
4. Follow APA style conventions throughout.
5. Use track changes (MS Word) so all edits are visible and reversible.


Requirements:

1) Prior experience copy editing for peer-reviewed academic journals, ideally in business, management, hospitality, or social sciences.
2) Strong command of academic English register (native English is not required — I'm looking for editing skill and journal-style fluency, not a specific nationality).
3) Must confirm the editing will be done personally by you, without routing the text through AI editing tools.
4) Familiarity with quantitative/mixed-methods research papers preferred.

Budget: USD 200-230 or INR 20,000 - 22,500

Social media outreach and research support — independent research initiative (part time, remote)

Overview

We are an independent research initiative documenting the lived experience of people rejected by automated hiring systems. We are building a public register of anonymous testimonies to support academic research and policy work on accountability in AI hiring.

We are looking for a part-time freelancer to support our outreach activities on Reddit and LinkedIn, helping us reach people who have been affected by automated hiring systems and encouraging them to share their story.

What you will be doing

Reddit outreach

Identifying posts and comments in relevant subreddits (r/recruitinghell, r/jobs and similar) where people have shared experiences of automated rejection

Drafting personalised DM messages based on their specific post or comment for the convenor to review and send
Monitoring responses and flagging replies that need attention
Identifying new subreddits and communities worth approaching

LinkedIn support

Identifying relevant comments on posts and creating a spreadsheet/doc with links to the posts for review
Researching relevant LinkedIn groups and communities for visibility

Community and group outreach

Posting to relevant Facebook groups, career communities and job seeker groups
Monitoring responses and managing follow-up where appropriate

General research support

Identifying other platforms, communities and channels where affected candidates gather
Keeping a simple log of outreach activity and responses

What we are looking for
Strong written English: messages must feel personal and genuine, not templated
Some familiarity with Reddit and how communities work there
Good research instincts: finding the right people in the right places
Discretion: this work involves people sharing sensitive personal experiences
Organised and reliable able to work independently with minimal supervision

What we are not looking for
Someone to post from or access the convenor's personal LinkedIn or Reddit accounts
Generic mass messaging or spam approaches
Content creation or graphic design
Hours and rate

Flexible, approximately 5 to 10 hours per week to start. Please include your hourly rate in your application.

Skills: Data Entry, Research, Content Writing, Social Media Marketing, Social Media Management, Writing, Academic Research, Data Collection, Data Management, Community Management

I am applying to Advanced Standing Dental Programs through CAAPID and have a draft of my personal statement. I am looking for an experienced editor to help improve the structure, clarity, flow, and overall impact while keeping my own voice and experiences.

Hello,
I am looking for assistance with revising a Machine Learning journal manuscript that has received a Major Revision decision.

The manuscript is written in LaTeX and is approximately 30 pages (including figures, tables, and references). It focuses on cyberbullying detection using classical machine learning models.

The revision includes addressing reviewer comments such as strengthening the related work, improving the discussion and limitations, adding an architecture diagram and pseudocode, improving comparisons with recent studies, and advising or implementing technical requests where appropriate (e.g., cross-validation, statistical analysis, explainability, or providing justified responses if additional experiments are not necessary).

I’m looking for someone with strong experience in Machine Learning/NLP research, LaTeX, and revising manuscripts for journals such as IEEE, Springer, Elsevier, or similar.

Could you please let me know:
1. Whether this project falls within your expertise.
2. Your estimated cost for completing the revision.
3. Whether you can complete it within 4 weeks.

Hi, i have draftd outline of my book. need help with author to finish the chapters and make the book around 260 pages. I would need help with ghost writer, edit, and reasonable, economic publishing.

I have a full Microsoft Word draft of my PhD research proposal on AI-driven clinical healthcare systems. The science is solid; what I need now is a meticulous editor who can shape it into polished, unmistakably human academic prose while bringing the document into flawless compliance with recognised PhD-level formatting standards.

Academic formatting conventions are my chief concern. That means a transparent heading hierarchy, seamless transitions that guide the reader through each chapter, uniform figure and table captions, and absolute consistency in in-text citations and references (currently set up for APA, though I can switch if you advise). While doing so, please keep every technical term, equation and dataset reference intact—no simplification or content cuts.

Beyond the formatting overhaul, I want sentences that vary in rhythm, avoid mechanical repetition and sound as though they were crafted by an experienced researcher, not an algorithm. Your background editing theses, dissertations or journal articles—especially in AI, machine learning or health-tech—will help you recognise the nuance of the terminology.

Deliverables
• Tracked-changes version highlighting every edit
• Clean, submission-ready version complying with the agreed citation style
• Brief change log explaining any major structural moves

Kindly share a line or two about similar doctoral work you have polished and an estimated turnaround time. I’m ready to send the file as soon as you are.

Skills: Proofreading, Technical Writing, Editing, Research Writing, LaTeX, Academic Writing, Academic Research, Writing Tutoring

We are an online academic media and research tech platform used by schools, universities and library consortia. We have warm inbound and outbound leads already generated — we need someone to run the demo and close the sale.

What you'll do

Run live video demos of the platform to pre-qualified school and university contacts
Handle objections, follow up, and close subscriptions
Feed back to us on what's landing and what isn't

What you won't do
Prospecting or list-building. Leads come to you warmed and briefed.

Who we're looking for
Prior sales experience in education, edtech, academic publishing or library services
Comfortable presenting to heads, bursars, librarians and academic staff
Willing to learn the platform properly. You'll be expected to know every feature before your first call.

Compensation
Hourly rate for delivery
Commission on every closed subscription

I have a complete research manuscript that was drafted with the help of AI tools. While the structure is sound, the text still carries that unmistakable “machine” tone. I want every sentence rewritten so it reads as if it were composed by an experienced human researcher—smooth, engaging, and academically rigorous.

You will receive the full document (introduction through conclusion, references included). Your task is to:

• Recast the wording into clear, natural academic prose while preserving all technical detail and meaning.
• Strengthen flow and readability, eliminating any repetitiveness or awkward phrasings typical of AI output.
• Verify consistency in terminology, citations, and data descriptions so the final draft stands up to peer review.

The finished file should be ready for journal submission: precise, scholarly, and unmistakably human-written.

Skills: Research, Technical Writing, Editing, Research Writing, Content Writing, Academic Writing, Content Strategy, Academic Research, Content Development, Content Verification

Interested candidates should submit the following:

• Current CV or resume.
• Cover letter highlighting federal and DoD business development experience.
• Examples of proposal writing, opportunity research, or business development work, if available.
• List of U.S. federal agencies, contract vehicles, or programs you have supported.

Salary: $100 bi weekly

Work Monday, Wednesday and Friday

I need an academic research paper focused on evidence-based practice in the healthcare sector.

Requirements:
- In-depth research and analysis on a specific evidence-based practice topic within healthcare
- Comprehensive review of current literature
- Clear, structured, and academic writing style
- Proper citation and referencing according to academic standards

Ideal Skills and Experience:
- Advanced degree in healthcare or related field
- Strong research and analytical skills
- Experience writing academic papers
- Familiarity with evidence-based practice in healthcare

Looking for a detailed and well-articulated paper based on the question
In pregnant women diagnosed with gestational hypertension, does a technology-supported, nurse-led education and lifestyle-management program, compared with routine antenatal care, reduce blood pressure and progression to preeclampsia during pregnancy?



NR449 RUA: Topic Search Strategy (Sept23)
NR449 RUA: Topic Search Strategy (Sept23)
Criteria Ratings Pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeClinical Question (30 points/25%)
1. Describe the problem. What is the focus of your group’s work?

2. Explain the significance of the problem in terms of patient outcomes. What health outcomes result from your problem? Or what statistics document this is a problem? You may find support on websites for government or professional organizations.

3. PICOT question in support of the group topic.

4. State the purpose of your paper. What will your paper do or describe? This is similar
to a problem statement. “The purpose of this paper is to . . .”
30 pts
Highest Level of Performance
Includes 4 requirements.
26 pts
High Level of Performance
Includes 3 requirements.
23 pts
Satisfactory Level of Performance
Includes 2 requirements.
12 pts
Unsatisfactory Level of Performance
Includes 1 requirement.
0 pts
Section not Present
No requirements for this section presented.
30 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeLevels of Evidence (20 points/16%)
1. Identify the type of question being asked (therapy, prognosis, meaning, etc.).

2. What is the best type of evidence to answer that question (e.g., RCT, cohort study, qualitative study, etc.)?
20 pts
Highest Level of Performance/High Level of Performance
Includes 2 requirements.
10 pts
Satisfactory Level of Performance
Includes 1 requirement.
0 pts
Unsatisfactory Level of Performance/Section Not Present
No requirements for this section presented.
20 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeSearch Strategy (50 points/43%)
1. List search terms and results.

2. Databases used (start with the CU library). Link your search with the PICOT question described above.

3. Refinement decisions. As you did your search, what decisions did you make in refinement to get your required articles down to a reasonable number for review? Were any limits used? If so, what?

4. Identification of two (2) most relevant articles (primary sources published within the last 5 years).
50 pts
Highest Level of Performance
Includes 4 requirements.
43 pts
High Level of Performance
Includes 3 requirements.
38 pts
Satisfactory Level of Performance
Includes 2 requirements.
19 pts
Unsatisfactory Level of Performance
Includes 1 requirement.
0 pts
Section Not Present
No requirements for this section presented.
50 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeOrganization and APA Style (20 points/16%)
1. Correct grammar and spelling.

2. Include a title page.

3. Use of headings for each section.

4. Clinical Question, Levels of Evidence, Search Strategy, and Conclusion

5. Adheres to current APA formatting and guidelines.

6. 3-4 pages in length, excluding title and reference pages.
20 pts
Highest Level of Performance
Includes 6 requirements.
17 pts
High Level of Performance
Includes 5 requirements.
15 pts
Satisfactory Level of Performance
Includes 3-4 requirements.
8 pts
Unsatisfactory Level of Performance
Includes 1-2 requirements.
0 pts
Section Not Present
No requirements for this section presented.
20 pts
Total Points: 120

Skills: Research, Technical Writing, Report Writing, Research Writing, Medical Writing, Statistical Analysis, Qualitative Research, Academic Writing, Academic Research, Public Health

Hello!

How are you ?

I need your support in preparing paper publications in the data engineering, data analytics or artificial intelligence, big data in ieee or scopus indexed journals

Or if you can help me to publish any articles on InfoQ, the new stack Dzone let me know.

I’m a software engineer. Please let me know if you can help

Several draft journal papers are ready for a careful final pass before submission. The focus is on standard academic conventions: cleaning up grammar, tightening punctuation, ensuring terminology is consistent, and generally polishing the prose so it reads smoothly and professionally.

Because the manuscripts address different topics, familiarity with common citation styles (APA, MLA or Chicago) and the ability to flag any reference list issues will be appreciated, but the central task remains meticulous line-by-line proofreading. Each file will be supplied as an editable Word document, and I will track changes to review every adjustment you make.

Please indicate recent experience proofreading scholarly work and note your typical turnaround time for articles of 6,000–8,000 words. I expect prompt communication and a straightforward, no-surprises approach: return the marked-up document, plus a clean version ready for submission, and highlight any sections that require author clarification.

Skills: Proofreading, Editing, Research Writing, Article Rewriting, Content Writing, Academic Writing, Academic Publishing, Academic Research

I have a batch of contract summaries covering minerals, oil & gas, and forestry concession agreements or development contracts in African countries between MNEs and governments. I need experienced paralegals/lawyers who are already familiar with the typical clauses, royalty structures, and regulatory obligations in these sectors. As part of an academic research, I want paralegals/lawyers to read each summary carefully and provide two scores of ambiguity and unconscionability with short notes that justify your decision. The results will feed directly into an academic research project, so consistency and transparent reasoning are essential.

You will receive:
• PDF copies of every contract summary (no full contracts)— 40 contract summaries (3 pages each on average)
. A table to write your scores and notes.

I need you to:
1. Work through every summary, applying your legal expertise
2. Add a short note and two scores for each.

Deliverables: A completed table plus notes.

When you submit your bid, please point me to past work that shows hands-on experience with natural-resource or similarly complex commercial contracts, especially in Africa. You may find similar contracts at https://resourcecontracts.org/ and https://openlandcontracts.org/

That evidence will weigh heavily in my selection.

Skills: Legal, Research, Legal Research, Research Writing, Legal Writing, Paralegal Services, Academic Research, Legal Analysis, Legal Review, Compliance Auditing

We are conducting an academic research pilot on how biopharma information moves from scientific and regulatory sources into media coverage. We need careful independent coders to complete a paid blind-rating test.

This is not stock picking, investment advice, or market prediction. You must not look at stock prices or returns during the assignment.

Paid qualification task ($25 fixed price):
- Review a rating manual and a blinded 10-case packet containing 21 source items.
- Assign three separate ratings to every source: fundamental information value (F0-F5), attention/reach (A0-A5), and narrative change (N-2 to N+2).
- Give a short evidence-based rationale for every rating.
- Preserve all CSV fields and return a completed CSV.
- Work independently and do not use another coder's answers.
- Expected effort: approximately 60-90 minutes after reading the instructions.

Important: Do not complete the rating test as part of your proposal. The packet will be provided only after a paid contract is opened. We expect to hire several candidates for the same independent test and may select two coders for a larger follow-on pilot.

Preferred background:
- Medicine, pharmacy, life sciences, clinical research, regulatory affairs, epidemiology, biostatistics, biomedical writing, or biopharma research.
- Ability to distinguish animal, Phase 1/2/3, endpoint, biomarker, regulatory designation, advisory committee, and formal approval evidence.
- Strong English reading and concise evidence-based writing.
- Careful compliance with blinding and file-format instructions.

Deliverable:
One completed CSV with 21 rated source rows, concise rationales, and confirmation that no post-event market information was consulted.

Please answer the screening questions in your proposal. Generic proposals that do not address the questions will not be shortlisted.

I'm seeking assistance to prepare my social sciences manuscript for journal submission. The manuscript is currently in the initial draft stage, and I need help with:

- Proofreading and Editing: Ensure clarity, coherence, and academic rigor.
- Formatting: Align with specific journal guidelines.
- Research and Data Analysis: Support in refining research and analyzing data.

Ideal skills and experience:
- Expertise in social sciences.
- Strong editing and proofreading background.
- Familiarity with academic journal formatting.
- Proficient in research methods and data analysis techniques.

Your support will be crucial in making my manuscript publication-ready.

Skills: Research, Proofreading, Editing, Research Writing, Statistical Analysis, Academic Writing, Data Analysis, Academic Research